Post by joita973 on Feb 12, 2024 8:45:35 GMT
The transferred to the beneficiary. He is the beneficiary of the insurance contract even though the compensation amount is paid by the insurance company to the Company. The authoritys comments regarding the ancillary nature of insurance services in relation to leasing services are not accurate. These are two completely separate legal relationships. Neither of them can be said to have any function ancillary supplementary or additional to the other contract. Insurance service.
With regard to incorrect implementation of Art. Ab of the th Directive the Cape Verde Email List Company alleged that the Polish provisions of the Act do not require including costs such as packaging transport and insurance costs in the tax base for the supply of goods or services. The insurance service is separate from leasing and therefore the company is obliged to determine the turnover for each of the services provided. . Alleging a violation of Art. of the Sixth Directive the Company explained.
That it concluded insurance contracts for and in the interest of the beneficiary specifying the beneficiary in the contract as the person who is the user of the insured item. The conclusion of contracts by the financing party provided the beneficiaries with insurance protection on competitive terms with the possibility of obtaining preferential premiums. Since the beneficiary of the insurance service is the user in this situation the position of the Director of the Tax Chamber that it is not possible to use the provisions of Art. of the th Directive.
With regard to incorrect implementation of Art. Ab of the th Directive the Cape Verde Email List Company alleged that the Polish provisions of the Act do not require including costs such as packaging transport and insurance costs in the tax base for the supply of goods or services. The insurance service is separate from leasing and therefore the company is obliged to determine the turnover for each of the services provided. . Alleging a violation of Art. of the Sixth Directive the Company explained.
That it concluded insurance contracts for and in the interest of the beneficiary specifying the beneficiary in the contract as the person who is the user of the insured item. The conclusion of contracts by the financing party provided the beneficiaries with insurance protection on competitive terms with the possibility of obtaining preferential premiums. Since the beneficiary of the insurance service is the user in this situation the position of the Director of the Tax Chamber that it is not possible to use the provisions of Art. of the th Directive.